Can large cities generate their own weather?

The “urban heat island effect” refers to the increased temperatures of urban areas compared with their rural surroundings.

The urban heat island is a well-documented example of inadvertent modification of climate by human activities. It is a classic example of how changing the energy balance of an area can affect the regional climate.

The urban heat island is evident in statistical analysis of surface air temperatures, and was first discovered in the early 1800s in London.

On average, a city is warmer than the countryside because of differences between the energy gains and losses of each region. A number of factors can contribute to the relative warmth of cities, such as heat from industrial activity, the thermal properties of buildings, and the evaporation of water.

Heat produced by heating and cooling city buildings and running planes, trains, buses and automobiles contributes to the warmer city temperatures. Asphalt, brick and concrete retain heat better than do natural surfaces.

Evaporation of water plays a role in defining the magnitude of the urban heat island. Solar energy absorbed near the ground in rural areas evaporates water from the vegetation and soil. Thus, heating in the rural areas is reduced to some degree by evaporative cooling during evapotranspiration.

Megacities tend to have up to 10 percent more cloud cover than surrounding rural areas. (Photo: Pixabay)

A recent study of clouds over London and Paris using satellite data indicates that cities may be generating clouds. During the spring and summer, these megacities are persistently cloudier in the afternoon and evening than nearby rural areas. The authors suggest that the heat retained by buildings drives motions that lead to cloud formation.

Meteorologists have thought that regions downwind of large cities receive more than their expected share of rainfall; however, conclusive evidence has been hard to gather.

Steve Ackerman and Jonathan Martin, professors in the UW-Madison Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, are guests on WHA radio (970 AM) at 11:45 a.m. the last Monday of each month.
Category: Meteorology, Phenomena

Comments Off on Can large cities generate their own weather?

Has this been an unusually dreary spring?

From April 1 to June 13, Madison Wisconsin was 0.46 degrees cooler than  normal and accumulated 1.94 inches above normal precipitation, some falling as snow as late as April 27!
(Photo by J. Hart, State Journal archives)

With astronomical summer set to begin on Friday morning at 10:54 a.m. in Wisconsin, it seems like a good time to consider the nature of this seemingly dreary and cold spring that we have just endured.

Almost no one will disagree that this year has had a memorably bad spring, not only locally but around the nation as widespread flooding has put elements of the agricultural sector well behind their normal schedules.

From April 1 to June 13 we have averaged 0.46 degrees below normal in Madison and we have accumulated 1.94 inches above normal of liquid equivalent precipitation, some of it falling as snow as late as April 27.

In the previous four springs we have had similar experiences only once. Some may recall that last April 1 through June 13 we were 0.36 degrees colder than normal and accumulated nearly 7 inches of snow on April 18. In the prior three years during the same period we averaged 1.94, 0.71 and 2.19 degrees above normal. None of these years was notably warm during the period but these recent records do suggest that this year presents a relatively unusual set of circumstances.

In fact, it may be that we have not had such a persistently cool spring since 1997 when April was 3.3 degrees below normal, May was 6 degrees below normal and the first 13 days of June averaged 1.75 degrees below normal, leading to an overall departure of 4.16 degrees below normal for the same period in that year.

So, though we have been waiting for spring to transition to summer, we had it much worse 22 years ago.

Category: Climate, Meteorology, Seasons

Comments Off on Has this been an unusually dreary spring?

Is that photo of circular lightning?

Some see the shape of Wisconsin in this looping lightning bolt that struck near Hager City Wisconsin on May 31. (Credit: Jerry Zimmer)

When we see a flash of lightning, it looks as though it forms all at once.

However, a lightning bolt is actually produced in many steps. The bolt occurs so quickly that it looks like a single brilliant flash, but high-speed photography can reveal several distinct bolts.

Lightning is a huge electrical discharge that results from the rising and sinking air motions that occur in thunderstorms. Lightning can travel from cloud to cloud, within the same cloud, or between the cloud and ground. The lightning in the accompanying photograph appears to be cloud-to-ground lightning.

A typical cloud-to-ground flash begins as negative charges in the cloud that travel toward the ground in a sequence of spurts. These spurts of negative charges are called “leaders.”

Leaders travel a few hundred feet. From the lower end of one leader, another leader forms, and from the lower end of that leader, another. The negative charges hop downward from leader to leader, forming an ionized channel.

Each leader heads in a direction that is independent of the previous ones. Leaders can split, forming tree-like branches resulting in a path that is not a straight line. Most lightning appears jagged because of this, but it also can take a curved path, as in this photograph.

As the negative charges approach the ground, there is an upward stream of positive charges. When the two streams meet, an initial flash occurs in the channel and electricity flows back and forth between the cloud and ground, lighting up the sky.

The ionized channel formed by the leaders is three-dimensional. So, while the bolt in the photograph looks like a 2-D outline of our state, it could be a 3-D spiral that just appears 2-D as we look along its axis. Either way, it is a fantastic and unique photograph.

Category: Meteorology, Phenomena, Severe Weather

Comments Off on Is that photo of circular lightning?

Why was the sky hazy on Thursday and Friday?

Satellite view of wildfire smoke over the Upper Midwest. Via GOES East (GOES-16)

There have been large forest fires in northern Alberta, Canada, and the smoke has drifted over the Midwest, including Wisconsin.

Smoke can cause the sky to appear hazy, even if the smoke is high above the ground. The smoke scatters sunlight to make the sunlight diffuse and grayish. When the smoke is thick, it can cause brilliant red sunsets and sunrises, as it did on Thursday. When light beams interact with particles suspended in air, the light can be scattered or absorbed.

The amount of light that is being scattered is a function of the number of particles and the size of the particle relative to the wavelength of the light falling on the particle. Small particles, like those of which smoke is composed, scatter violet and blue light more effectively than other colors.

So, as the sun sets and its rays pass through the smoke plume, all the blue light is scattered out of the path between the setting sun and your eyes, leaving just the red and orange colors. This results in the sun having a bright red color when it is low on the horizon. Recently, the smoke above us has been thick enough that the red sun disappeared from view before it set below the horizon.

Winds will sometimes transport the smoke down to the ground, resulting in a reduction in the quality of the air we breath. The small particles that make up the smoke can cause respiratory problems, particularly for children, the elderly and people with asthma.

Smoke doesn’t have much of an effect on our temperature or precipitation. However, official weather reports include observations on sky conditions and visibility.

Category: Phenomena, Weather Dangers

Comments Off on Why was the sky hazy on Thursday and Friday?

What is the Beaufort scale?

Wave watchers check out the ocean action near Peggy’s Cove, Nova Scotia, during Hurricane Bill in August 2009. Based on observations rather than measurements, the Beaufort scale is a method of estimating wind speed based on the general condition of the surface of a large body of water with respect to wind waves and swell. (Photo credit: Associated Press Archives)

The Beaufort scale is a method of estimating wind speed based on the general condition of the surface of a large body of water with respect to wind waves and swell.

It is based on observation of sea state rather than accurate wind measurements. This scale allows sailors to estimate the wind speed just by observing the state of the sea surface.

The scale has a long history, but was finalized in 1805 by Rear Admiral Sir Francis Beaufort, an Irish hydrographer in the British Royal Navy. It was officially first used during the voyage of Charles Darwin on the HMS Beagle (1832-1835).

The Beaufort scale can also be applied to conditions on land, but it is most often associated with the sea state.

The modern-day Beaufort scale consists of 13 numbers ranging from 0 to 12. A zero value on the Beaufort scale is assigned to calm winds and the water surface is smooth.

A Beaufort force 12 occurs with waves greater in height than 46 feet and the sea is completely white with foam and spray with greatly reduced visibility. Such conditions are associated with wind speeds of greater than 74 mph, which are hurricane-force winds.

The National Weather Service defines sustained wind speeds of 39 to 54 mph as a gale, and forecasters typically issue gale warnings when winds of this strength are forecast. A Beaufort force 6 is a near gale with wind speeds between 25 and 30 mph and includes white foam from breaking waves that begins to be blown in streaks along the wind direction.

A Beaufort force in the range of 6 to 7 is designated as strong winds; 8 to 9 as gale-force winds; and 10 to 11 as storm-force winds.

Category: Meteorology, Severe Weather

Comments Off on What is the Beaufort scale?